Bromley Unitary
Development Plan Proof of Philip
Kolvin Crystal Palace
Park Crystal Palace
Campaign Section
18
Go forth into the Park, take glass and iron, and - beauty wedding strength - produce the Industrial Hall of Nations.
Punch, of the Crystal Palace.
18 Conservation:
Objections to Chapter 6 policies. (0296I, 0297I, 0296J,
0297J) 18.1 A further opportunity for
protection is lost in policy BE11, which deals with historic
parks and gardens. The policy states that the Council will
seek to ensure that such places are appropriately managed,
improved and maintained, and that development proposals
should have due regard to their special characteristics and
interest. This misses out a crucial verb in national
planning policy PPG15: "protect". Paragraph 2.24 of the
Guidance reads as follows: Again no additional
statutory controls follow from the inclusion of a site in
English Heritage's Register of Parks and Gardens of
Special Historic Interest (see paragraph 6.38), but local
planning authorities should protect registered parks and
gardens in preparing development plans and in determining
planning applications. The effect of proposed development
on a registered park or garden or its setting is a
material consideration in the determination of a planning
application. Planning and highway authorities should also
safeguard registered parks or gardens when themselves
planning new developments or road schemes. (Emphasis
added). 18.2 While the Council deleted
the word "developed", it inserted the word "improved", which
does not meet the objection. I do not understand why the
Council would wish to resist adopting the words of the
national policy. I have suggested that, to accord with
national policy, the policy should simply read: 18.3 At the same time, while
the Council merely notes that Crystal Palace Park is a Grade
II* listed park, I suggest that the opportunity be taken to
bring together its designations and reflect its
sensitivity: 18.4 This suggestion receives
peremptory treatment in Bromley's schedule of responses,
saying it is a statement of fact which it would be
inappropriate to add. No reasons are given why it is
inappropriate. In fact, it is entirely appropriate to
collect references to the designations of this strategic
Park in one place, and to underline that sensitive treatment
is required. All of the UDP consists of statement of fact or
policy. The fact that something states fact is hardly
justification for its exclusion. Furthermore, the Bromley
proposal is to tell the public that the top site and the
sports centre are development sites, and to describe why
this is so. It is very difficult to understand why it would
not also wish to underline that strong planning designations
are attached to the land. 18.5 Finally, policy BE14 is
deficient, in that its commentary refers to the Council's
desire to protect major skyline ridges from insensitive
development, but the policy itself fails to do so. The
current UDP provides in policy E11 that the Council will not
normally permit proposals for high buildings which adversely
affect strategically important local views
and
skyline ridges. It is not understood why that has been
dropped from the current version of the policy. I have
suggested a perpetuation of the previous policy so as to
accord with the proposed commentary: 18.6 Bromley's response is that
the importance of skyline ridges is acknowledged in the
commentary and the policy adequately addresses the issue. Of
course, the policy does not adequately address the issue,
because while the commentary refers to views of borough or
local importance, landmarks and major skyline ridges, the
policy inexplicably omits the last of these.
Historic parks
and gardens
The Council
will protect registered parks and gardens in determining
planning applications. The Council will seek to ensure
that historic parks and gardens are appropriately managed
and maintained.
"Crystal
Palace Park is a site of particular sensitivity. It is
the only Grade II* listed park in the borough. Most of
the Park is a Conservation Area and all of it is
Metropolitan Open Land. Any proposed treatment of the
Park will need to pay close regard to these
designations."
"The Council
will not normally permit development that adversely
affects strategically important local views, views of
local importance, landmarks and skyline
ridges."
Top
of Section;
Previous
Section (17);
Next
Section (19);
Contents
©Philip Kolvin